Leadership that Boosts Performance in Knowledge-Work Teams
- Barry Byington

- Jan 12
- 2 min read

If you lead smart, busy people (partners, executives, high-performers, etc.), you have probably felt this tension: you want high standards and accountability, but you also need initiative, creativity, and follow-through when no one is watching. That tension maps nicely onto two well-studied leadership buckets. Transformational leadership (energize and align people around purpose) and transactional leadership (clarify expectations, feedback and consequences).
A classic meta-analysis in the Journal of Applied Psychology found that transformational leadership shows a strong, consistent relationship with performance and effectiveness outcomes, and that both transformational and transactional behaviors contribute value when used well.
The practical takeaway
High-performing teams usually get the best results when leaders pair meaning with mechanics:
Meaning (transformational): "Here's why this matters, and what great looks like."
Mechanics (transactional): "Here's the standard, how we'll measure it, and how we'll respond."
That combination is especially useful in small professional-service settings where work is complex, deadlines are real, and "figuring it out" is part of the job.
A clean playbook you can use this week
Make the target unmissable Performance problems often hide inside vague goals. Try a one-sentence “definition of done” for recurring work:
Done means: quality standard + deadline + handoff pointExample: “Draft is done when it answers X and Y, cites Z authority, is in client voice, and is ready for partner review by Thursday 3 pm.”
This is transactional leadership in its best form: clear expectations without micromanaging.
Connect tasks to purpose, not just pressure
People will grind for deadlines, but they sustain for purpose. A quick purpose cue before big pushes:
“This matters because it reduces client risk.”
“This is how we build a reputation for responsiveness.”
“This is part of how we make room for more innovative work.”
That is transformational leadership in a lightweight, non-cliche way.
Use feedback like a system, not a mood
If feedback only shows up when something goes wrong, people start playing defense. Two small upgrades can look like this:
Predictable cadence: short weekly check-in questions: What’s blocked? What’s unclear? What’s one win?
Fast reinforcement: name what “good” looked like within 24 hours when possible.
This supports performance and helps the communication climate you are already focused on improving.
Create a “safe to raise issues” norm
Innovation dies when people think, “Not worth bringing up.” One line that can change the game in your business:
“If you see a risk, friction, or improvement, I want it early, even if it’s not fully fleshed out.”
Then prove it by responding with curiosity first and evaluation second.
Here is a quick self-audit you can use
Pick one project and rate yourself 1 to 5:
Expectations are specific (quality, timeline, ownership).
People understand why this matters.
Feedback is frequent and behavior-based.
Barriers are surfaced early without punishment.
Wins are recognized quickly and specifically.
Improve the lowest score first. That is usually the biggest ROI.
Sources Used
Judge, T. A., & Piccolo, R. F. (2004). Transformational and transactional leadership: A meta-analytic test of their relative validity. Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(5), 755–768. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.89.5.755
_edited.jpg)



Comments